The district court’s finding that party acted with gross negligence or in bad faith with respect to discovery obligations is ordinarily sufficient to support finding that missing or destroyed evidence would have been harmful to the party. Residential Funding Corp. v. DeGeorge Financial Corp., 306 F.3d 99 (2d Cir. 2002).
Archive for the ‘Judge Jose A. Cabranes’ Category
Case Blurb: Residential Funding Corp.; Finding that party acted with gross negligence or in bad faith sufficient that missing evidence harmful to movant
Posted by rjbiii on September 3, 2007
Posted in 2nd Circuit, Adverse Inference, Case Blurbs, Judge Jose A. Cabranes | Leave a Comment »
Case Blurb: Residential Funding Corp.; Negligence sufficient to establish culpable state of mind element for adverse inference instruction, 2nd circuit
Posted by rjbiii on September 3, 2007
The “culpable state of mind” factor required for adverse inference instruction based on breach of discovery obligation may be satisfied by showing of negligence, rather than bad faith or gross negligence. Residential Funding Corp. v. DeGeorge Financial Corp., 306 F.3d 99 (2d Cir. 2002).
Posted in 2nd Circuit, Adverse Inference, Case Blurbs, Judge Jose A. Cabranes | Leave a Comment »