Post Process

Everything to do with E-discovery & ESI

State Law Bibliography

Post Process-This is not a comprehensive listing, but we are adding to it as often as we can. Although some cases cited below are Federal Courts, the cases will contain an interpretation of state law. Any linked opinions will likely open into a PDF file, so be prepared.

ALABAMA

  • Judicial Oversight and Procedure of Discovery
    • Ex parte Cooper Tire & Rubber Co., 2007 Ala. LEXIS 229 (Ala. Oct. 26, 2007)
    • Ex parte Vulcan Materials Co., 2008 Ala. LEXIS 79 (Ala. Apr. 25, 2008 )
  • Standards and Procedure for Appealing Trial Court Decisions on Discovery and Evidence
    • Ex parte Vulcan Materials Co., 2008 Ala. LEXIS 79 (Ala. Apr. 25, 2008 )
    • Ex parte Cooper Tire & Rubber Co., 2007 Ala. LEXIS 229 (Ala. Oct. 26, 2007)
  • Cost Shifting
    • Ex parte Cooper Tire & Rubber Co., 2007 Ala. LEXIS 229 (Ala. Oct. 26, 2007)
  • Spoliation of Evidence as a Cause of Action
    • Townsend v. General Motors Corp., 642 So. 2d 411, 415 (Ala. 1994)

ARIZONA

ARKANSAS

CALIFORNIA

  • Attorneys’ Responsibilities and Ethical Conduct
    • Moreno v. Ostley, 2011 WL 598931 (Alameda County Super., Feb. 22, 2011)
  • Authentication of Evidence
    • Miyamoto v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 176 Cal. App. 4th (Cal. App. 6th Dist. 2009)
  • Computer Forensics
    • Moreno v. Ostley, 2011 WL 598931 (Alameda County Super., Feb. 22, 2011)
  • Cost Shifting
    • Toshiba v Sup. CT, 124 CA4th 762 (2004)
    • Friedman v. Sup. CT, 2006 WL 2497981 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct., Aug. 29, 2006)
  • Court’s Scope of Authority to Manage Discovery
    • Toshiba v Sup. CT, 124 CA4th 762 (2004)
  • Spoliation: Cause of Action
    • Kearney v. Foley & Lardner, LLP, 566 F.3d 826, 838-39 (9th Cir. Cal. 2009)

FLORIDA

  • Data Aquisitions and Computer Forensics
    • Menke v. Broward County Sch. Bd., 916 So. 2d 8 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 4th Dist. 2005)
  • Spoliation as an Independent Cause of Action
    • Martino v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 908 So. 2d 342 (Fla. 2005)

ILLINOIS

  • Cause of Action for Spoliation
    • Perks v. County of Shelby, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77575 (C.D. Ill. Aug. 31, 2009)

INDIANA

  • Data Aquisitions and Computer Forensics
    • AGS Capital Corp. v. Prod. Action Int’l, LLC, 2008 Ind. App. LEXIS 725 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008 )

MAINE

  • Cause of Action for Spoliation
    • Parlin v. Cumberland County, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83192 (D. Me. Sept. 11, 2009)

MARYLAND

  • Data Aquisitions and Computer Forensics
    • Authsec, Inc. v. Roberts, 2007 MDBT 3 (Md. Cir. Ct. 2007)

MASSACHUSETTS

  • DUTY TO PRODUCE
    • Munshani v. Signal Lake Venture Fund II, 13 Mass. L. Rep. 732 (Mass. Super. Ct. 2001)

NEW JERSEY

  • Waiver of Privilege
    • Stengart v. Loving Care Agency, Inc., No. BER-L-858-08 (N.J. Super. Ct. Law Div., March 6, 2009)

NEW YORK

  • Discoverability of ESI
    • Delta Fin. Corp. v. Morrison, 2006 NY Slip Op 26332 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2006)
  • Data Acquisitions and Computer Forensics
    • Etzion v. Etzion, 2005 NY Slip Op 25115, 2 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2005)
  • Discovery Requests and Scope of Discovery
    • Lipco Elec. Corp. v. ASG Consulting Corp., 2004 NY Slip Op 50967U, 1 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2004)
  • Search Protocol
    • Delta Fin. Corp. v. Morrison, 2006 NY Slip Op 26332, 4 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2006)
  • NORTH CAROLINA
    • Discovery Costs
      • Analog Devices, Inc. v. Michalski, 2006 NCBC 14 (N.C. Super. Ct. 2006)
    • Undue Burden
      • Analog Devices, Inc. v. Michalski, 2006 NCBC 14 (N.C. Super. Ct. 2006)
      • Bank of Am. Corp. v. SR Int’l Bus. Ins. Co., 2006 NCBC 15 (N.C. Super. Ct. 2006)

    OHIO

    • State Law Cause of Action for Spoliation
      • Ed Schmidt Pontiac-GMC Truck, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Co., LLC, 2008 WL 2704859 (N.D. Ohio July 7, 2008 )

    OREGON

    • State Law Cause of Action for Spoliation
      • In re Helicopter Crash near Wendle Creek, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41477 (D. Conn. May 18, 2009)

    PENNSYLVANIA

    • Discoverability of ESI
      • In re Cullen Litigation, 2007 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 1 (Pa. County Ct. 2007)

    TEXAS

    • Data Acquisitions and Computer Forensics
      • In re Honza, 242 S.W.3d 578 (Tex. App. Waco 2008 )
    • Undue Burden
      • In re Kimberly-Clark Corp., 228 S.W.3d 480 (Tex. App. Dallas 2007)

    WASHINGTON

    • Attorney Client Privilege
      • Sitterson v. Evergreen Sch. Dist. No. 114, 2008 Wash. App. LEXIS 2751 at *17 (Wash. Ct. App. Nov. 25, 2008 )

    WISCONSIN

    • Form of Production
      • WIREdata, Inc. v. Village of Sussex, 2007 WI App 22, P65 (Wis. Ct. App. 2007)

    Leave a Reply

    Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

    WordPress.com Logo

    You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

    Twitter picture

    You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

    Facebook photo

    You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

    Google+ photo

    You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

    Connecting to %s

     
    %d bloggers like this: