Post Process

Everything to do with E-discovery & ESI

Recent Posts
2nd Circuit 3d Circuit 5th Circuit 9th Circuit Admissibility of ESI Adverse Inference Articles Authentication Best Practices Case Blurbs Case Summary Computer Forensics D. Md. Data Management Discovery Discovery Requests Document Retention Duty to Preserve Duty to Produce email Form of Production FRCP 26(b) Magistrate Judge Paul W. Grimm Privacy S.D.N.Y Sanctions Scope of Discovery Spoliation Technology Trends
Categories
- 10th Circuit (21)
- 11th Circuit (19)
- 1st Circuit (8)
- 2nd Circuit (66)
- 3d Circuit (33)
- 4th Circuit (20)
- 5th Circuit (35)
- 6th Circuit (19)
- 7th Circuit (15)
- 8th Circuit (5)
- 9th Circuit (36)
- Admissibility of ESI (23)
- Adverse Inference (23)
- AL Sup. Ct. Justice Sue Bell Cobb (2)
- AL Sup. Ct. Justice Thomas A. Woodall (2)
- Alabama (4)
- Arbitrations (2)
- Around the Block (1)
- Articles (162)
- Attorney Client Privilege (11)
- Attorney Liability (6)
- Attorney Work Product (1)
- Authentication (24)
- Back Up Tapes (12)
- Bad Faith (3)
- Bankruptcy Court (2)
- Bankruptcy Judge Mary A. Walrath (3)
- Bankruptcy Judge Michael G. Williamson (2)
- Best Practices (24)
- Blocking Statutes (1)
- Blog Posts (1)
- Blogroll (1)
- Bowditch & Dewey LLP (1)
- Browsers (2)
- Bryan Sartin (1)
- Burden of Proof (2)
- C.D. Cal (2)
- C.D. Ill. (1)
- California (1)
- Case Blurb-IL (1)
- Case Blurbs (223)
- Case Blurbs-AL (4)
- Case Blurbs-CA (1)
- Case Blurbs-FL (3)
- Case Blurbs-NJ (1)
- Case Blurbs-OR (1)
- Case Blurbs-WA (1)
- Case Summary (32)
- Case Summary-CA (1)
- Case Summary-FL (1)
- Case Summary-ME (1)
- Cell Phones (1)
- Chancellor William B. Chandler (2)
- Chat Room Content (4)
- Circuit Judge J. Clifford Wallace (1)
- Civil Investigative Demand (1)
- Collection Protocol (1)
- Compliance (4)
- Computer Animations (1)
- Computer Forensics (23)
- Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (2)
- Computer Security (10)
- Computer Simulations (1)
- Connecticut Uniform Trades Secrets Act (1)
- Conversion (1)
- Cooperation Between Parties (3)
- Copyright Infringement (1)
- Cost of Discovery (9)
- Cost Shifting (10)
- D. Colo. (11)
- D. Conn. (2)
- D. Del. (8)
- D. Hawaii (2)
- D. Kan. (7)
- D. Mass. (6)
- D. Md. (24)
- D. Me. (1)
- D. Minn. (1)
- D. Or. (1)
- D. Utah (2)
- D. Vt. (1)
- D.D.C. (10)
- D.N.J. (1)
- D.S.C. (3)
- Data Collection (16)
- Data Custodians (8)
- Data Dump (3)
- Data Management (53)
- Data Manipulation (3)
- Data Mining (1)
- Data Retention Practices (10)
- Data Sources (17)
- Databases (3)
- De-Duplication (3)
- Default Judgment (6)
- Del. Ch. (2)
- Deliberative Process Privilege (1)
- Demand Letter (4)
- Digital Millenium Copyright Act (1)
- Digital Photographs (1)
- Discovery (44)
- Discovery Requests (35)
- Dismissal of Case (4)
- Document Retention (25)
- Document Review (1)
- Duty to Conduct a Reasonable Inquiry (5)
- Duty to Disclose (8)
- Duty to Preserve (72)
- Duty to Produce (42)
- E-Discovery Pitfalls (3)
- E.D. La. (8)
- E.D. Mich. (8)
- E.D. Pa. (4)
- E.D. Wis. (4)
- E.D.N.Y. (4)
- EDD Basics (6)
- EDD Industry (8)
- EDD Processing (6)
- EDD Vendors (5)
- eDiscovery Counsel (2)
- Effectively Managing E-Discovery (7)
- Electronic Communications Privacy Act (1)
- Electronic Discovery Reference Model (3)
- email (24)
- Embedded Objects (1)
- Employee Practices (3)
- EnCase (3)
- Encryption (4)
- Ethics (1)
- European Union (1)
- Exclusion of Evidence (3)
- Expert Witness (3)
- Fed. Circuit (3)
- File Formats (3)
- FL Sup. Ct. Justice Charles T. Wells (1)
- Florida (3)
- FOIA (1)
- Forensics (3)
- Form of Production (26)
- FRCP (2)
- FRCP 26 (4)
- FRCP 26(a) (2)
- FRCP 26(b) (24)
- FRCP 26(c) (3)
- FRCP 26(e) (2)
- FRCP 26(f) (6)
- FRCP 26(g) (2)
- FRCP 28(b) (1)
- FRCP 30(b)(6) (1)
- FRCP 34 (10)
- FRCP 34(a) (8)
- FRCP 34(b) (4)
- FRCP 36 (1)
- FRCP 36(a) (1)
- FRCP 36(b) (1)
- FRCP 37 (3)
- FRCP 37(a) (2)
- FRCP 37(b) (2)
- FRCP 37(e) (1)
- FRCP 45 (2)
- FRCP 45(c) (1)
- FRCP 45(d) (1)
- FRCP 56(e) (1)
- FRE 1001 (1)
- FRE 1002 (1)
- FRE 1003 (1)
- FRE 1004 (1)
- FRE 1005 (1)
- FRE 1006 (2)
- FRE 1007 (1)
- FRE 1008 (1)
- FRE 102 (1)
- FRE 104 (1)
- FRE 104(a) (1)
- FRE 104(b) (1)
- FRE 34(b) (1)
- FRE 401 (1)
- FRE 404(b) (1)
- FRE 502 (6)
- FRE 702 (2)
- FRE 803 (2)
- FRE 804 (1)
- FRE 807 (1)
- FRE 901 (2)
- FRE 901(a) (2)
- FRE 901(b)(1) (5)
- FRE 901(b)(3) (3)
- FRE 901(b)(4) (7)
- FRE 901(b)(7) (2)
- FRE 901(b)(9) (3)
- FRE 902(11) (1)
- FRE 902(5) (1)
- FRE 902(7) (1)
- George Socha (1)
- Good Cause (7)
- Good Faith (3)
- Guidance Software (1)
- H. Christopher Boehning (1)
- Hague Convention (1)
- Hard Drive Inspections (2)
- Hash Values (2)
- Heller Ehrman (1)
- Humor (1)
- In the Ordinary Course of Business (3)
- Inadvertent Waiver of Privilege (1)
- Industry Events (4)
- Industry News (3)
- Information Governance (2)
- Information Retrieval (1)
- Information Security (2)
- Inherent Power of Fed. Courts (8)
- Instant Messaging (2)
- International Issues (14)
- Judge A. Wallace Tashima (2)
- Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein (2)
- Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly (1)
- Judge David Alan Ezra (1)
- Judge David Hurd (1)
- Judge David M. Lawson (1)
- Judge Florence-Marie Cooper (2)
- Judge Floyd R. Gibson (1)
- Judge George Z. Singal (1)
- Judge Gregory L. Frost (2)
- Judge J.P. Stadtmueller (4)
- Judge James G. Carr (2)
- Judge James Gardner (1)
- Judge Jose A. Cabranes (2)
- Judge Joseph A. Farnan Jr. (1)
- Judge Joseph E. Irenas (1)
- Judge Joseph F. Anderson Jr. (3)
- Judge L.T. Senter Jr. (1)
- Judge Lee H. Rosenthal (8)
- Judge Louis L. Stanton (6)
- Judge Marilyn Hall Patel (5)
- Judge Marsha Perchman (2)
- Judge Michael A. Ponsor (1)
- Judge Michael J. Davis (1)
- Judge Michael M. Baylson (2)
- Judge Orlando L. Garcia (2)
- Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer (2)
- Judge Richard Mills (1)
- Judge Richard W. Story (1)
- Judge Robert F. Kelly Sr. (1)
- Judge Robin J. Cauthron (1)
- Judge Ronald B. Leighton (3)
- Judge Rudi M. Brewster (2)
- Judge Shira A. Scheindlin (18)
- Judge Stefan R. Underhill (1)
- Judge Steven M. Colloton (1)
- Judge Susan Illston (4)
- Judge Thomas Beall Griffith (1)
- Judge Thomas W. Thrash Jr. (1)
- Judge Timothy C. Batten (1)
- Judge Vanessa L. Bryant (1)
- Justice Edgar D. Ross (2)
- K&L Gates (1)
- Key Players (5)
- Key Words (4)
- Laws (9)
- Legacy Systems (1)
- Legal Fees Awarded (1)
- Legislation (8)
- Litigation Hold (11)
- Litigation Support (2)
- LPO (1)
- M.D. FL. (1)
- M.D. Fla. (5)
- M.D. La. (14)
- Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson (4)
- Magistrate Judge Allan Kornblum (1)
- Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton (1)
- Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Peck (10)
- Magistrate Judge Barbara Major (1)
- Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer (5)
- Magistrate Judge Carl Horn III (2)
- Magistrate Judge Christine Noland (15)
- Magistrate Judge Christopher A. Nuechterlein (2)
- Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud (1)
- Magistrate Judge Craig B. Schafer (7)
- Magistrate Judge David A. Baker (2)
- Magistrate Judge David J. Waxse (2)
- Magistrate Judge David Nuffer (1)
- Magistrate Judge Donald A. Scheer (4)
- Magistrate Judge Donald W. Bostwick (2)
- Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Jenkins (2)
- Magistrate Judge Frank Maas (2)
- Magistrate Judge Gerald L. Rushfelt (1)
- Magistrate Judge Jermome J. Niedermeier (1)
- Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola (9)
- Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Wilkinson Jr. (6)
- Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby (2)
- Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix (3)
- Magistrate Judge Louisa S. Porter (4)
- Magistrate Judge Martin C. Ashman (4)
- Magistrate Judge Michael Hegarty (1)
- Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub (1)
- Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King (4)
- Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner (1)
- Magistrate Judge Paul W. Grimm (25)
- Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whaley (2)
- Magistrate Judge Randolf F. Treece (1)
- Magistrate Judge Robert B. Collings (1)
- Magistrate Judge Robin S. Rosenbaum (1)
- Magistrate Judge S. Allan Alexander (1)
- Magistrate Judge Timothy S. Hillman (5)
- Maine (1)
- Marginal Utility Test (1)
- Meet and Confer (5)
- Metadata (10)
- Michigan (1)
- Monetary Damages (4)
- Motion to Compel (4)
- Motion to Quash (2)
- MS Office (2)
- N.D. Cal. (15)
- N.D. Fla. (1)
- N.D. Ga. (3)
- N.D. Ill. (4)
- N.D. Ind. (2)
- N.D. Miss. (1)
- N.D. Ohio (2)
- N.D.N.Y. (3)
- Native Files (2)
- Neutral Third Party (3)
- NJ (1)
- Objections to Discovery Requests (15)
- Ohio (1)
- Operating Systems (1)
- Overly Broad Request (8)
- Password Protection (2)
- Possession or Custody or Control Of Evidence (1)
- Privacy (26)
- Privilege (11)
- Privilege Log (6)
- Project Management (3)
- Protective Order (2)
- Reasonable Anticipation of Litigation (8)
- Reasonably Accessible (6)
- Red Flags Rule (1)
- Regulatory Proceedings (1)
- Relevance (11)
- Request for Admissions (1)
- Resources (1)
- Ronald Stay (1)
- S.D. Cal. (5)
- S.D. Fla. (7)
- S.D. Ill. (1)
- S.D. Miss. (1)
- S.D. Ohio (7)
- S.D. Tex. (8)
- S.D.N.Y (48)
- Safe Harbor (1)
- Sanctions (75)
- Scope of Discovery (25)
- Search Engine Technology (5)
- Search Protocols (17)
- Self-Regulation (1)
- Site News (5)
- Social Media Sites (3)
- Source Code (2)
- Spoliation (69)
- Spreadsheets (1)
- State Courts (13)
- State Licensing Laws (4)
- states (4)
- Storage Media Technology (2)
- Stored Communications Act (2)
- Subpoenas (2)
- Sup. Ct. Virgin Islands (2)
- Technology (32)
- Technology Assisted Review (1)
- Texas (8)
- Texting (3)
- The Sedona Conference (4)
- The Sleuth Kit (2)
- Third Parties (2)
- Tools (12)
- Trade Secrets (3)
- TreCorder (1)
- Trends (73)
- Trespass to Chattels (1)
- Trial Presentation Systems (1)
- TX Judge Felipe Reyna (3)
- Uncategorized (14)
- Undue burden or cost (13)
- United Kingdom (2)
- Unreasonably Cumulative (3)
- User Forum Postings (1)
- Vague Discovery Requests (1)
- Vendor Liability (4)
- Video Files (2)
- Voice Mail Systems (1)
- W.D. Mich. (2)
- W.D. Tex. (2)
- W.D. Wash. (6)
- W.D.N.C. (2)
- WA Judge David H. Armstrong (1)
- Waiver of Privilege (11)
- Washington (2)
- Website Capture (1)
- Websites (2)
- West Virginia (1)
- White Papers (1)
Pages

Subscribe
- Entries (RSS)
- Comments (RSS)
The Tweeting Life
- Wonder if Wall Street will feel the same once brokers & traders are replaced with algorithms? twitter.com/the__future/st… 11 hours ago
- RT @statebaroftexas: Houston-area residents: Call @thehba LegalLine (713) 759-1133 from 5-9 p.m. today for free legal advice https://t.co/3… 1 day ago
- @Popehat @dsigningwmn @adamsteinbaugh Next they'll be kneeling during the national anthem & eating arugula. Where does it all lead? 1 month ago
- If hackers didn't already have that idea in their minds...well, they do now... twitter.com/th3j35t3r/stat… 1 month ago
- @MikeBrem Hi Mike, Thanks for the kind words on the board. Find my "cougar" account: @RolandB3 1 month ago
- @mutex7 @ggreenwald @WSJ @YahooNews @businessinsider @Slate You misread my post. I want to lessen the leverage of t… twitter.com/i/web/status/8… 2 months ago
- @mutex7 @ggreenwald @WSJ @YahooNews @businessinsider @Slate It's a little difficult for you to now argue against id… twitter.com/i/web/status/8… 2 months ago
- @mutex7 @ggreenwald @WSJ @YahooNews @businessinsider @Slate Sometimes that policy is prudent. Sometimes not. Thus, my "case-by-case" basis. 2 months ago
- @mutex7 @ggreenwald @WSJ @YahooNews @businessinsider @Slate *aren't* 2 months ago
- @mutex7 @ggreenwald @WSJ @YahooNews @businessinsider @Slate Again...the Syrian refugees would vigorously disagree.… twitter.com/i/web/status/8… 2 months ago
October 2008

M T W T F S S

« Sep Nov »

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19

20 21 22 23 24 25 26

27 28 29 30 31
Blogroll
Resources

Case Blurb: Ahner; Objection on Relevance due to Form of Production Requested not Valid

Posted by rjbiii on October 17, 2008

[I]t is not a valid ground for objection that relevant, non-privileged, electronic data can be produced in paper form, when the requesting party has specified production in an electronic format.

Auto Club Family Ins. Co. v. Ahner, 2007 WL 2480322 at *4 (E.D.La. Aug. 29, 2007) (internal citations removed)

Advertisements

Related

This entry was posted on October 17, 2008 at 11:03 pm and is filed under 5th Circuit, Case Blurbs, E.D. La., Form of Production, Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Wilkinson Jr., Relevance. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Enter your comment here...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Email (required) (Address never made public)

Name (required)

Website

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

« Case Blurb: Ahner; Fact that Producing Party is Testifying Witness Magnifies Need for Disclosure During Discovery

Case Blurb: Ahner; Primary Factor of Undue Burden Turns on Storage Format of Documents »

%d bloggers like this: