Case Blurb: Ahner; Objection on Relevance due to Form of Production Requested not Valid

The Tweeting Life

RT @SCOTUSPlaces: There is a better argument that McConnell violated a *constitutional* norm than that Pelosi did bc Art. II Sec. 2 makes… 2 weeks ago

RT @TheEconomist: Bookmakers put a Labour majority at 20/1 but a hung parliament remains plausible econ.st/38eS0U0 1 month ago

@adamjohnsonNYC Here's an article calling Benito Mussolini a strongman... irishcentral.com/roots/history/… 2 months ago

Yeah, I mean she's only giving up her seat in Congress (she'd be favored to win re-election) for a zero percent cha… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 3 months ago

RT @spekulation: Holy shit, Amazon just donated another MILLION DOLLARS to the Chamber of Commerce's PAC, three weeks before the election.… 3 months ago

RT @ellenforsyth: Chicago Public Library to eliminate late fees, erase debt and begin automatic renewals for up to 45 weeks - Chicago Sun-T… 3 months ago

How does one plot to be born to a real-estate mogul? twitter.com/MastersConf/st… 6 months ago

RT @EFF: “If people saw a cop sitting in front of their church or their oncologist writing down license plates, people would be concerned."… 6 months ago

RT @JimBridenstine: BIG NEWS: The next @NASASolarSystem mission is… #Dragonfly – a rotorcraft lander mission to Saturn’s largest moon Titan… 7 months ago

RT @associatesmind: Whoa! Mississippi Supreme Court enacts new Bar Admission rules. 3 strikes (failing the Bar), back to #lawschool for a… 8 months ago

October 2008
M	T	W	T	F	S	S
« Sep		Nov »
	1	2	3	4	5
6	7	8	9	10	11	12
13	14	15	16	17	18	19
20	21	22	23	24	25	26
27	28	29	30	31

Case Blurb: Ahner; Objection on Relevance due to Form of Production Requested not Valid

Posted by rjbiii on October 17, 2008

[I]t is not a valid ground for objection that relevant, non-privileged, electronic data can be produced in paper form, when the requesting party has specified production in an electronic format.

Auto Club Family Ins. Co. v. Ahner, 2007 WL 2480322 at *4 (E.D.La. Aug. 29, 2007) (internal citations removed)

This entry was posted on October 17, 2008 at 11:03 pm and is filed under 5th Circuit, Case Blurbs, E.D. La., Form of Production, Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Wilkinson Jr., Relevance. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Enter your comment here...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Email (required) (Address never made public)

Name (required)

Website

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Google account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

« Case Blurb: Ahner; Fact that Producing Party is Testifying Witness Magnifies Need for Disclosure During Discovery

Case Blurb: Ahner; Primary Factor of Undue Burden Turns on Storage Format of Documents »

Post Process

Everything to do with E-discovery & ESI

Recent Posts

Categories

Pages

Subscribe

The Tweeting Life

Blogroll

Resources

Case Blurb: Ahner; Objection on Relevance due to Form of Production Requested not Valid

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Post Process

Everything to do with E-discovery & ESI

Recent Posts

Categories

Pages

Subscribe

The Tweeting Life

Blogroll

Resources

Case Blurb: Ahner; Objection on Relevance due to Form of Production Requested not Valid

Share this:

Like this:

Related

Leave a Reply Cancel reply