Post Process

Everything to do with E-discovery & ESI

Case Blurb: WESTLB AG, de-duplication of relevant documents, scope of duty to preserve

Posted by rjbiii on August 28, 2007

[A] party or anticipated party must retain all relevant documents (but not multiple identical copies) in existence at the time the duty to preserve attaches, and any relevant documents created thereafter. In recognition of the fact that there are many ways to manage electronic data, litigants are free to choose how this task is accomplished. Quinby v. WESTLB AG, 2006 WL 2597900 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) (citing Zubulake IV, 220 F.R.D. at 218).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: