Post Process

Everything to do with E-discovery & ESI

Case Blurb: Quintus Corp., Test for spoliation

Posted by rjbiii on August 28, 2007

Inquiry is whether the party destroying documents “knew or should have known that the destroyed evidence was relevant to pending, imminent or reasonably foreseeable litigation.” In re Quintus Corp. v. Avaya, Inc., 2006 WL 307982 (Bkrtcy. D. Del. 2006) (citing Shamis v. Ambassador Factors Corp., F.3d 1469, 1479 (D.C. Cir. 1995)).


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: